Find a Lawyer

DR. SAYED JAVAID HUSSAIN SHAH versus SECETARY, REVENUE DIVISION; ISLAMABAD

Customs Act 1969 Section 224 Auction Rules, 1996 (section RO 663 (2) / 96, dated 7 8 1996), R21 and extension of section 9 of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000 of XXXV), section 9 The forfeited wage money balance was paid after the due date after the adjustment of the refundable amount through the pay order, previously paid in the bid Accuracy of the customs officials was justified in seizing the twenty-two amount when successful bid. The payer failed to make a fourth deposit, in this regard it was clear in Rules 21 and 22 of the auction that any waiver or rebate or any refund was required. Are, once submitted to the outstanding amount in case of successful bid and to pay the balance. Until the due date, the complainant did not have the right to refund any outstanding balance. The Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended that the chairman order an inquiry into the circumstances arising to the Central Board of Revenue. According to a PCSIR test report, the sale of inferior quality 725kg black tea, which was found to be illegal for human consumption, when the complainant returned the tea to the customs authorities, gave the same tea to other people without any cage. The health of innocent civilians disposed of in quantity and if inquiries have revealed that the complainant's wrongdoing in this regard is correct, appropriate action should be taken against the officers responsible for playing with the health and life of the citizens. top civil advocates from Toru lawyer