MUHAMMAD DIN versus CIVIL JUDGE, DISTRICT COURTS, RAWALPINDI
AIX, R 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Failing to consider the decision of the High Court passed in the amending jurisdiction while keeping aside the constitutional jurisdiction of the previous order, the High Court scope trial court. The matter had already happened between. Further, the trial court also did not decide the record Judita's case in light of the evidence brought to the record, because the relevant order could not be placed at the relevant time because the attack on the predecessor in the interest of the applicants. Had suffered. Such a pre-judgment and decree was filed in the constitutional petition. The jurisdiction was generally not available to anyone who failed to appeal the appeal but where the previous order passed by the trial court. The document was not in the proper use of its jurisdiction. The same was encountered with failure to exercise jurisdiction if: If so, this order issued by the trial court of interference in such a previous case, though not appealed by the petitioner. Had gone and the previous judgment and the High Court had in the circumstances rejected an order.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
