Find a Lawyer

MST. IQBAL BEGUM versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Failure to pay the landlord for the acquisition of Section 25 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 intra-court land, compliance with decree passed by the civil court jurisdiction of the Lahore Development Authority Tribunal dispute, the legal heirs of the deceased The dispute was settled by the civil court in respect of the legal shares of the KK because it had decided to the parties' right that the court had refused to comply with the court's decree only because the Lahore Development Authority Civil. Was not taking part in the proceedings before the court and it was not an injunction. Obligatory decision of the powers granted by the civil court and he is also entitled to inherit the property between the parties to the deceased owner who has determined the rights of the parties and as a result the Lahore Development Authority has to implement it. Had to And the tribunal established under the Lahore Development Authority Act 1975 had no jurisdiction to either abrogate the decree or to say that it was not bound by the tribunal, only seeing that the Lahore Development Authority was not a party to the suit court. There was an error in witnessing that the deceased owner's widow was already over-sold. More than her share of the shares, she was not entitled to sell the land further without considering the extent to which the rest of the land was mortgaged and not to mention the fact that the rest of the land was leased. Was acquired by the Lahore Development Authority. Consider the widow's cell obtained in favor of various vendors without any compensation or rebellion or in favor of a widow cell, therefore, the Lahore Development Authority should be given to the shopkeepers. immigration advocates contact from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer