Find a Lawyer

KHALIL AHMED versus THE STATE

A case was filed after a case was filed against Section 8 and 9439 fugitive property belonging to the fugitive, the car dispute object against the applicant. That the applicant, whose car was based on the car's transfer proceedings, appeared in the court with unclean hands; the possibility of a false transfer of the car from the competitor to avoid being attached to it in the future. Can't really be denied. The said transfer was to be determined in favor of the applicant for which the trial court had rightly directed the inquiry under Sections (6A) and (6C) of section 88, order of the CCPR trial court. There was jurisdictional action. In order to determine whether the transfer of the car in favor of the applicant was genuine or to deceive the court even otherwise, the order of inquiry was also one which was accepted by the applicant and At the same time, the court had directed the bonds to be carried on superdriver as directed by the court and they can no longer claim that the order itself was illegal when the bail was not accepted. Will feel the complaint. It filed an existing review request, before the court could enter a new bond of bail in relation to the order imposing the inquiry injunction in this case, the revision request was dismissed in the circumstances. top advocates from Bajaur lawyer