Find a Lawyer

TAJ MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE

The value of the Sections 302/149, 324/149 and 148 evidence came to light on the day, along with the specific role in the immediately-recorded FIR, which eliminated any possibility of mistaken identity of the accused. The eyewitnesses were natural, truthful, and faith-bearing witnesses, whose presence could not be doubted by the accused. Based on the statement of the witness who did not appear before the trial court in the trial, the opinion of the police on the accused's guilt or innocence was not confirmed, the evidence was irrelevant The investigating officer's prosecution case was not fatal. The medical evidence of the incident proved to be h, the ad hoc testimony proved that the accused had committed the cold-blooded massacre on the spot and injured the witnesses in a brutal manner without justification. The sentence of the accused was maintained in the circumstances. famous high court advocate from Rawalpindi lawyer