Find a Lawyer

MESSRS SUFI RESTAURANT, MELODY MARKET MAIN CIVICS CENTRE, ISLAMABAD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 65 Formation of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000 of the XXV), notice of the Section 9 Additional Assessment Pre-Show was recommended against the Central Board of Revenue Special Section Officer under section 65. Take appropriate disciplinary action to initiate action. The Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, without the prior approval of the Inspector Additional Commissioner Assessing Officer, stated that the showcase notice under section 65 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 was a forward notice to investigate the facts and to seek clarification. Appropriate Income Tax Ordinance, Act 65 was worked on the assessee's assessor under section 65 and according to the first appellate authority, such process had been going on for a long time and no one had objected to the Income Tax Ordinance. Section 65, 1979 provides that no action can be taken under the above section at the moment This will be done until the Assessing Officer has received the final information and has obtained written approval of the Inspector Additional Commissioner in advance so that they can take action against the Examiner, before commencing any action against the Examiner. Must act as necessary for the officer to obtain accurate information. Without the prior approval of the inspector additional commissioner, no action can be taken under section 65 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, which was given a notice of reason to ascertain the accuracy of the information obtained. The foregoing notice was reported. The officer was completely illegal and the unnecessary department may call it a pre-show cause notice but in reality this income lawer from fb area from Tarmatan lawyer