Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAQOOB versus PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD

Criminal prosecution for proving the violation of the Customs Act 1969, 185 C and 187 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request for Customs Act, 1969 and a Special Judge Customs Effect Dissection Ones has to face trial before a special court. Judge Customs and he were acquitted at trial, the same facts were initiated by the authorities against the applicant, and the petitioner deposited different amount of customs duty through which the applicant applied. Requested that the amount of the discrimination should be returned to the applicant. Special Judge was acquitted by Customs Justification In a criminal case it is always possible that the prosecutor, beyond reasonable doubt, set his case against the accused and at all times the accused is liable to prove the guilty. It is not necessary to appear as a witness or to testify or even to present evidence in self-defense. On the other hand, the issue of decisive action under the Customs Act, 1969, after a case of infringement by the customs authorities, has come to the decision-maker. The notice must be issued to the person against whom the matter is presented to show cause. Why should a person can not do that action against him by default in such notice. The accused has to produce evidence and the decision maker has to state that such person is not responsible for violating the provisions of the Customs Act, 1969, as stated in the showcase notice. Even when a person is prosecuted by a Special Judge Customs top civil advocates from Jalozai lawyer