ISMAT ARA BEGUM versus MALIK IFTIKHARUDDIN
Section 55 (1) (a) Non-disclosure effect of material defects in property agreement As in the contract - the seller's disclosure of the defect in the title of the property by the seller was that the registration of the words - at present in the contract agreement. All defects in the property were included Validation of such words cannot be justified - complete and honest disclosure of the defect in the title of the suit property. The responsibility of displaying such a defect was heavy on the shopkeepers, should be disclosed in comparison to the vendor's disclosure, it is not clear in the document where these vendors chose to take the inappropriate title and There was no compelling evidence to disclose and, according to the law, this disclosure was actually done by the shopkeepers. Conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Khoski lawyer
