Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN versus MRS. GULNAR SHER MUHAMMAD

A VII, R 2 Arbitration Act (X40 of 1940), Articles 2 (a) (b), 8, 14 and 24 referring to suits for matters, a referee agreed to refer to the arbitration and referee dissolution parties. And made a statement about it and the referee was appointed before the trial court with the consent of the parties, and the trial court ruled in accordance with the referee's statement and said that the order was dismissed. had gone. Otherwise the time restriction was forbidden, that the referee's report was equivalent to an award, by any force, because there was a clear distinction between the arbitrator and the referee, after the arbitrator inquired into the dispute and determined the dispute. Will decide. In keeping with the principles of natural justice and the judicial procedure in keeping with the law of the land, it was primarily to decide that such a decision of the arbitrator was known as an award statement. The referee did not seek it, But the court was empowered to decide after an inquiry based on their knowledge, but a referee was not authorized to agree on the basis of an agreement or agreement between the parties. When the referee's statement was processed, the parties were bound and no appeal could be filed against the judgment and decree passed by the court based on the referee's statement as determined by the parties' consent. advocate for immigration from Kotla Pathan lawyer