MUHAMMAD NASEEM KHAN C/O AIR TRAVEL CONCEPT (P) LTD., LAHORE versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Section 3, 35 and Second Schedule to the Wealth Tax Act 1963, CL (7) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Request Wealth Tax, Scope of Error Correction of Implementation of Assets Created by Foreign Remittances Missed for 1991 92, but not for the wearing of 1992 ars 96, although his waiver was exempt until 1995 96 The correction of such error sought by the assessee was re-used on the basis that the appellate forum on this matter. The source was to be considered and beyond its jurisdiction. Section 35 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963, exempted the Wealth Tax from the year it did not receive such remittances, but in the next five years there was no reason to deny the claim for subsequent years, The High Court accepted the constitutional petition and set aside the invalid order by appearing wrong on the record face of an unknown order, which would result in the application for correction be considered pending before the authority. Be decided accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Baroute lawyer