Find a Lawyer

MESSRS KHAIR-UL-SANAT COTTON GINNERS, PRIVATE LIMITED versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Articles 96 and 102 of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000 v. XXV), Section 2 (3) and delayed repayment of 22 refund payments for four years non-refundable payment. Which was claimed to be corruption and compensation was also claimed to be delayed @ 15. At the same time, it was readily admitted that the refund was due to the complainant. When the relevant appraisal officer was asked to obtain confirmation whether the claim for refund was settled after making the required certification in accordance with the specific instructions of the Regional Commissioner of Income Tax for resolving the matter by 2 2002, the department's The representative acknowledged that the matter had not yet been settled, and that the Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended that such indifference to the instructions of the superiors and the apparent attempt to unnecessarily drag the couple unnecessarily. To be verified and a refund due to the complainant within 15 days. According to the provisions of Section 102 of the Income Tax Ordinance, the officer (who is not an office) on the basis of the order of payment of compensation and upon the instruction of the Regional Commissioner of Income Tax will be subjected and the ACR listed in the SE consultation. advocate for immigration from Sarai Alamgir lawyer