Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BAKHSH versus AHMAD NAWAZ

Section 24 (1) Premature Discrimination (ZAR) The trial court's jurisdiction over the extension of the trial court's jurisdiction overturned the case because of the provision that the provisional time and within the application be granted. Failed to deposit pre-emption amount (ZAR EOM). The period was also extended for extension, the appellate court allowed the appeal, extended the time for premature deposit (ZAR) and the trial court to remand the trial court after remand. The new default option was fixed and then expanded. Under the provisions of section 24 (1) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991, such submission was valid within the 30-day time limit; the trial court has no jurisdiction to extend the fixed period of 30 days. In order to allow maximum expansion. At that time, the appellate court, in the present case, exceeded its jurisdiction by extending the pre-deposit amount, provided for in section 24 (1) of the clause, by 30 days. The judgment and order of the Pre-Law Act, 1991 were approved by the lower appellate court and the trial court was reinstated. best advocate from Kahuta lawyer