Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/148/149/114/109/324/337 H (2) Protective Prior Arrest Guarantee The defendant suppressed his right to enter a pre-arrest bail on the last occasion and Had objected to its merits. Such behavior by the Sessions Court accused himself was sufficient to reject the exercise of discretion in his favor the accused should have referred to the High Court after his pre-arrest bail was rejected, but instead he was granted a security arrest warrant. Applied for a ten-year term. The High Court's accused did not surrender before the trial court some days ago and ordered the release of the security bail, the suspension of the non-bailable warrant and the order issued by the trial court against the accused and the accused alone. Had ordered In his favor, the petition was dismissed as a result of his refusal to exercise discretion.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
