Find a Lawyer

APPEAL NO.914/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 12TH DECEMBER, 2001. versus APPEAL NO.914/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 12TH DECEMBER, 2001.

Sections 3C and 210 section RO 476 (1) / 95, dated 14 6 1995 section RO 545 (1) / 94, dated 96 1994 section RO 455 (1) / 96, dated 13 6 1996 section RO 456 (1) / 96, Dated 13 6 1996 Budget Day Instructions C No l / 1CEB / 2001, Dated 18 6 2001 CBR Letter C No 4 (5) CEBED / 95, Dated 14 6 1995 CBR Letter C No. 1 (11) CEB / G6, Date 13. 6 1996 CBR Letter C No. 1 (3) CEB / 99, 23 23 1999 Central Excise Rules, 1944, R10 Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), Sections 3, 33, 34 and 36 of the value of taxes. Determination and Rate Duty Duty The metal containers used for packing of vegetable products impose a central excise duty, sales tax, as well as additional tax and penalty for melting point of appellant product at 10 ? C. What is more, the appeals were taken advantage of, the Central Excise Duty instead of the applicable rate of 15 15 on metal containers for breach of the condition listed in Sector RO 455 (1) / 96 dated 13 6 1996 1996. Discount (5% discount rate) Payment of 10 difference of central excise duty (difference between 15 and 5) and the specific amount as per the showcase notice due to the sales tax also / small price value on this factor. Notices were issued for collection in the Central Excise Duty and the Additional Duty under R 10 of the Central Excise Rules 1944, and for the collection of additional tax under Sections 34 and 36 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 and for the prosecution under section 8. ? Legislative Legislature has never intended for inefficiency or impossibility by adding a melting point of less than 10 ? C in the case of vegetable oils to the Central Excise Rules 1944 and Section 33 of the Sales Tax Act 1990. Up to 15% best law firm from Tando Adam lawyer