I.T.AS NOS. 595/KB TO 597/KB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 1ST JUNE, 2002. versus I.T.AS NOS. 595/KB TO 597/KB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 1ST JUNE, 2002.
1979 Section 52 of the Income Tax Ordinance is the responsibility of a person to fail to receive or pay tax. In the Developing Principle, the case of a deterrent agent with a deterrent agent was determined on a passing order under section 52 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. Note that no tax was paid on the same receipts by the recipient in the event that it is established that the recipient has paid tax on the payments or that the recipient's jurisdiction has declared There is no tax payable on such payments, so the withholding agent has no justification to deal with the withholding agent as the default asset because neither is on a single payment. There are two stages that can be taxed and no one can pay for it as default in relation to payments. Things can be considered. Receipts were declared as non-taxable in the hands of the recipients
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
