Find a Lawyer

MST. SHAMIM AKHTAR versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 13 (1) (e), 13 (2), 61 and 62 of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance Office (XVX of 2000), Section 9 undisclosed investments, etc. are considered income additions. No notice is processed through order sheet entries No reasonable opportunity was made to hear it without issuing any legal notice under section 61, 62 or 13 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1919 and the whole process was done through order sheet entries. And made an additional addition under section 13 (1) (e). In order to meet the estimated costs of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, it is clear that the complainant was provided with a reasonable opportunity to be heard, in lieu of general notice under Sections 61 and 62 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 That the legal requirements of both sections 13 (1) and 13 (2) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 were not fulfilled. In my writings it is stated that the assessee faces an increase under section 13 (1) (e). Have to Income Tax Ordinance In the presence of the Inspector Additional Commissioner in 1979, according to Section 13 of the Income Tax Ordinance, the complainant did not have sufficient money to provide a suitable opportunity; the order sheet of 1979 did not even record what the complainant had answered. It can be inferred from estimating that for estimating the provisions of section 13 (2), section 13 (2) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 was sought for which It was intended to be a proper release. This law was required only on the RCA sheet, stating that the assessee suffered an increase under section 13 (1) (e) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. Income tax order online advocate from FR Peshawar lawyer