Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS. 820(113) TO 822(113) AND 826(IB) OF 1999-2000, DECIDED ON 30TH NOVEMBER, 2001. versus I.T.AS. NOS. 820(113) TO 822(113) AND 826(IB) OF 1999-2000, DECIDED ON 30TH NOVEMBER, 2001.

Notice of submission of Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 57, 62, 65, 13 (1) (d), 13 (2), 30 (2) (c), 108, 110 and 111 total income. Issue of Assessment Year 1986 87 Issuance of Notice of Assessing Officer's Review Options beyond the five-year period, for filing returns for the assessment year 1986 87, under section 566 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, 12 2 1994. Demand for Assessment to File Return for Resolution Explained by Section 65, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, by Finance Ordinance, 2000, and from time to time, to any Assessor assigned to Assessing Authorization. Was issued, which required filing a return but did not do so, until earlier It appears that the date of the issuance of this notice is proceeding with the same clarification date and a large number of cases have been opened which have the effect of presenting many persons for filing returns. Matters are dealt with differently. Such mischief was discovered by the Legislature, and to suppress this corruption and to provide a cure, this section was added to Section 66 by the Finance Ordinance 2001, which reduced the powers of the examining officers. So that they could issue notices out of time. The intention of the legislature for five years was to ensure that it does not increase corruption and reduce the discomfort that had already been deferred by clarification, incorporated in section 66 by the Finance Ordinance, under s 56 56. This time around the role of 2000 was understandable, which should be invoked for pending cases as well as providing further modifications and treatment. jobs for fresh advocates from Sibi lawyer