Find a Lawyer

MESSRS THAL JUTE MILLS LTD., KARACHI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Establishment of Office of Schedule I Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000) of the Customs Act 1969, Claim of Section 9 Pre-shipment Inspection Fee and refund of 2% service charge on all goods specified in Schedule I of the Customs Act 1969 It was announced illegally by the Supreme Court and the complaining company that the refund amount paid as a pre-shipment inspection fee told the complainant that only the importer was entitled to a refund. Which was not accepted by the clients on the charge of 2% service charge filed by the Chartered Accountant to the Complaint Company A certificate issued by the complaining company did not approve the payment of 2% pre-shipment inspection service charges to the others / department during the complaint, dismissing the refund claim, irrespective of such certificate. ? Complainant 2 had failed to produce evidence in respect of pre-shipment service charges, the officer representing the officer promised to present the documents, but nothing was provided but instead passed the order in haste. Dismissing the documents that were submitted by the department document was a chartered accountant's certificate confirming that 2% of inspection charges had not been approved prior to shipment. Despite his certificate, there was no chance of rejecting a refund claim - there were only two possibilities either the Deputy Collector of Customs did not check the Chartered Accountant's certificate or he completely ignored it. What was He has already vowed to reject the claim immigration advocates contact from Nankana Sahib lawyer