Find a Lawyer

MESSRS SPECIALITY PRINTERS (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Establishment of Office of the Federal Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), Section 9 Inspection, Import Goods Rules, 1994 Assessment of Customs Act 1969 [Section RO No. 1108 (I) / 94, Dated 14 11 1994], R8 (2) (C) CBR Letter C No. 2 (2) S (W1) / 96, dated 14 3 1996 Finding the Cost of Imports and Exports before the CRF Shipment (P.F.) SI) Assessment of Return Price Returns ignoring Section 25B of the Customs Act, 1969, ignoring the Clean Report of Findings (CRF) issued by the Company on Pre-shipment Inspection (PSI), Justification dispute over customs values The dispute resolution forum suggested by New was not reported. And the Federal Export Promotion Board (FEPB) refund requests were not processed and the complainant was denied the opportunity to examine and contest the evidence of high value, and the issue to be finalized. Has been pending since 1996, and when this dispute is resolved, I still have the distinction, highly regarded by the department to ignore it and introduce higher prices without even telling the importer its basis. And against all the principles of tax law management if there were examples of high values, the evidence would not Was given. The importer was not disclosed nor given the opportunity to reject it, now he did so by pointing out several cases where the declaration and the CRF / evaluable values were in the same range as the complainant. In the realm of the fact was denied the opportunity to present its case and at the time of the assessment was better when you need a advocate from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer