MST. RUKHSANA AMJAD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Establishment of Office of Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 65, 59 (1) and 103 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000 V of 2000), Sections 9 and 2 (3) (i) Additional Assessment of Showcases under Section 65 of the Permanent Information Showcase Notice The Federal Tax Ombudsman on record, despite the presence of a credible document, delayed the receipt of the Income Tax Ordinance, only three times in 1979, without any definitive and up-to-date information, recommending that the relevant Special Officer deliberately make a mistake. Be advised to do. In an attempt to deny the refund payment to the relevant complainant appraisal officer, the preparation of IT 30 should be reported to the complainant, causing a delay of more than two years for payment of the refund. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax should be directed to abolish the proceedings initiated under Section 65 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 and issue notice under Section 65 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 for unnecessary harassment of the complainant. Appropriate repairs should be made for It is advisable to act as a Commissioner for Income and IAC and to be vigilant with the latest and precise information regarding the IAC.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
