Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD QASIM versus THE STATE

Section 2 evidence2 Testimony of evidence Benefit of the conviction Two of the five accused, who were in fact brothers and who were specifically injured in the crime, were found innocent during the investigation and were acquitted by the trial court's appeal against Baret. One of the two accused was acquitted, the other accused was acquitted and his acquittal was never challenged, the dispute was between the account and the medical evidence, the remaining two accused In the relevant time there were students, living in another place, records show that the complainant and the accused were enmity with many people. The possibility of false involvement of the accused in this case could not be ruled out, in the circumstances witnesses who involved five accused in the case and three of them were acquitted by the trial court. The testimony cannot be believed. Eyewitnesses who were not present at the scene of the remaining suspects were made witnesses, even to the point where the grass was cut by the complainant, not identified by eyewitnesses, No witness was cited from the surrounding area and the prosecution's case was filled with suspicion, the benefit of the suspect was to be found. As a matter of fact and not as a favor and the sentence sentenced by the trial court, the sentence was set aside and the accused was ordered to be released. jobs for fresh advocates from Shedani sharif lawyer