Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus DISTRICT OFFICER, REVENUE, SAHIWAL

The implementation of the Decree 42 and the Constitution 55 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 47 and the AXXI Constitution Petition Decree, in which the applicant was allotted in the possession of the suit property Was announced. By affirming the variations in their favor, it was demanded by the petitioner that the Revenue Authorities, under the legal obligation to confirm the recurrence on the basis of such decree, added ownership of the applicant's partnership only. The terms of the rule could have been contained in this decree under section 55 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, so as to compel the performance of the compulsory act under which the decision was passed in favor of the applicant. Was not enforceable and the application for its implementation / implementation was not submitted to the court which passed this order Or was, but was presented to the Revenue Authority, which required it to perform any work which the terms of the decree had not been directed to do, and the reluctance of the decision was not directed by the High Court. The Constitution was directed by the Constitutional Petition to direct the imposition of the judgment, which was not required by law. The High Court refused. The Revenue Authority was excluded, in any direction, to confirm the change. online advocate from Sanghar lawyer