Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD DIN versus MAYOR, LAHORE METROPOLITAN CORPORATION JINNAH HALL

Section 23 and 24 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the applicant's site-site plan, the complaint of the applicants not to occupy private land is that they have been owners of the suit land for the last twenty years and have banned them. Was imposed. Housing authorities over the land issue notices to applicants for construction of buildings without approval of site plans The authorities' proposed plans were rejected by the authorities on the basis that the revised scheme of this residential area had disputed the disputed land. Children's Park is shown, resulting in the demolition of housing applicants Applicants claim that the authority cannot reject their site plans and cannot be deprived of their property without proper payment. Is. A valid site plan can only be rejected when the rules set for its construction are violated. En Applicants' land was not acquired, they were not compensated, authorities did not apply for property from the applicant's land. Cannot be denied which are included in the park through the revised scheme if the authorities wish that the park should remain in the scheme, then they were obliged to proceed under Sections 23 and 24 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, And negotiate with the applicants and will be obliged to pay them the market value up to the extent of their land. In the present case sections 23 and 24 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, keeping in view the probable value of the land, the applicant has law firms from Tando Jam lawyer