Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

S.T.A. NO. 2754/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 1ST MARCH, 2002 versus S.T.A. NO. 2754/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 1ST MARCH, 2002


Sales Tax Act 1990 Section 34 Notice of excess tax show based on wrong tax was misidentified in the notice of arrears and due notice of excess tax which stated that the addition of additional taxes and penalties resulted in the receipt of sales tax. And also the order. The reviewer was instructed to pay additional taxes and penalties for the lower sales tax amount. The admitted factual position was contrary to the facts stated in the showcase notice and, likewise, the amount of sales tax was to be determined against the assessee as per the arrears. Incorrect because the assessee issued a notice because the entire sales tax amount was issued on false facts, it cannot be called a legal notice and consequently the order to increase the demand for sales tax arrears was clearly illegal.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
us immigration advocates from Swabi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.