I.T.A. NO. 185/KB OF 1998-99, DECIDED ON 26TH JULY, 1999. versus I.T.A. NO. 185/KB OF 1998-99, DECIDED ON 26TH JULY, 1999.
Tax deduction or payment to the assessee by default for non-consideration of Central Excise Duty for the purpose of deduction of tax under section 50, 50 and 86 of Income Tax Ordinance 1979, section 50 Has failed to do. Through the supplier itself, the first appellate authority set aside the order for de novo proceedings, under section 52 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 of the Department, declaring the assessee a default for small deductions. Was, under that amount the question had already been paid. The supplier issuing officer was not allowed to treat such amount as default because the same amount could not be recovered from two persons. Assessing officer, maximum income tax ordinance of 1979 86 and could receive additional taxes. You were from the date of the default / short deduction by the date of payment of the first appellate authority's provider / recipient order.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Dadakhel lawyer
