MUHAMMAD AAMIR versus THE STATE
Sections 2302 / evidence 324 / evidence 34 Definition of Evidence Defendant challenged the complainant's evidence because he did not name an accused in the FIR, but named him in his evidence. In addition, he did not name three of Eve's witnesses because the dispute was canceled because the FIR was present on the tenth occasion, because the defense did not challenge the complainant in its investigation. In the matter of adding the name of the special accused in the examination, the chief complainant had said that the FIR had been witnessed by other people. The defense dispute regarding special witnesses was settled in such a way that the complainant owned his statement under Section 154, CR PC, and in his evidence, fully supported it in clear terms in the material details. That is, as not all Eid witnesses can be declared. Ocular evidence of the occasion was proved with the help of medical evidence and the accused in connection with the collection of blood samples remained in custody long, in the death cell, after filing appeals in hopes of his release / acquittal. The death penalty was not called for. The death sentence was changed to life imprisonment given the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Kech lawyer