Find a Lawyer

PROF. DR. IQBAL AHMAD CHAUDHRY versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

The Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 Section 2 (3) and 9 Corruption Office reopened inquiries on the same matter when the sister asked for validity when multiple inquiries confessed that she had found no harmful evidence So, some final action should be supported rather than hanging a sword because this is annoying and annoying for taxpayers until repeat investigators or inquiries come out with some new facts. The meaning appears. And supporting the allegation that this is being done to harass the complainant at the request of a department official, such repeated investigations on the basis of irrelevant and false grounds lead to harassment of taxpayers and the Federal. The Tax Ombudsman recommended that if any further complaint was received in the future, it should be carefully avoided by the Regional Commissioner of Income Tax and if no fresh facts or concrete evidence is available, the investigation can be investigated. The department will report whether any action was initiated against the complainant for filing the complaint which has been found to be false and baseless. If action was taken then complete details should be provided and reasons for non-action if not taken. online advocate from Machh lawyer