Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS.. 1535/LB TO 1537/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 21ST NOVEMBER, 2001 versus I.T.AS. NOS.. 1535/LB TO 1537/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 21ST NOVEMBER, 2001

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 52, 50 (4), (5) and 62 impose a tax deduction on the part of a person temporarily liable for tax deduction or failure to pay. Imports were treated as default by applying. Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 1979 Validator's assertion clearly stated that the data was represented on which the provisions of section ((())) were not applied because of the same item. Was to be supplied and not imported from the matters from which the documents were presented. What was not particularly straightforward when the problem was not necessarily resolved and the order was not spoken, Yee not only mentioned the LC number but also gave the weight and quantity, which can easily be confirmed by the tribunal's record. A serious notice has been taken that Section 52 as a substitute for regular compensation. The case is a serious example of such a custom if no tax was levied on the import case, it was not deducted, which was negligent even though the status of the SC was an exception, if any tax. Could deduct, so it was under section 50 (5) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979. Was made defaulter by default and not by applying the assessee and by holding the SC in default on imports supported by the first appeal authority of section 50 (4). property advocates from Tobatek Singh lawyer