Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS. 521/KB TO 525/KB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 14TH MARCH, 2002 versus I.T.AS. NOS. 521/KB TO 525/KB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 14TH MARCH, 2002

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 129, 134 and 130 Appeal to Additional Commissioner of Income Tax Ordinance, Section 130 (1) of 1979 was not submitted The appeal was suffered because of the deficiency which the office had to deal with. It should be pointed out that if the Assessment failed to pay a fixed sum despite the deficiency indicating, the appeal could be called in for a hearing of the appeal, no such notice was given within the limitation period, Appeal was dismissed due to non-payment of, therefore, there is no sustained reduction due to non-payment of appeal fees at the time of filing. The appeal of the reviewer, which was not pointed out, did not meet the requirements of justice while the Appellate Tribunal vacated the order of the First Appellate Tribunal and again decided on the merit on payment of the appeal fee by the appellant. The matter was remanded within 15 (15) days from receipt of the Tribunal's order. best law firms from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer