Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMIN versus THE STATE

Proofs of Sections 302/324/34 of the Explosive Substances Act (VII 1908), Articles 3 and 4 were not recorded in the FIR, nor were they provided in the FIR nor the identification parade. Held, fourteen witnesses appeared in the trial court, but none of them made statements against the accused and even the trial court alleged that they did not lead to the recovery of any articles. But the only criminal evidence presented by the prosecution against the accused was the extra-judicial confession that would have been done by the two accused before the prosecution. Was. None of the witnesses were witnesses to the prosecution before the accused allegedly made extra judicial confessions, arrested the accused on the spot, and none of them reported the incident to the police that day. Statements of prosecution witnesses patent advocate from Chunian lawyer