Find a Lawyer

MALIK MASOOD UL HASSAN versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

The Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 section 2 (3) and 9 corruption auctions were held a day before the customs authorities notified the complainant, but the authorities set the auction date June 2, 1999. They were auctioned off on June 1, 1999. Such notification was made under the orders of the Ombudsman Department and the proceedings were tried to justify the basis that a notice for auction was published in two journals on 1 6 1999 and 2 6 1999. Was. It was not enough to issue a public notice to justify the change of date because the complainant was specifically told that the auction would take place on June 2, 1999, to inform the public notice of the auction date being issued in the ordinary course. Unlike in a party, customs officials were not denied any such irregularities, which the complainant protested and stated that the date of the auction was pointed out on June 2, 1999 and was auctioned. The bidder had to arrange for money so that the complainant visited the office on June 1 and time allowed at 30 pm. Was given but did not appear on its own. According to the department, the auction of irregularities was fixed for two days, ie 1st June, 1999 and June 2, 1999, as the complainant had auction date of June 2, 1999. The day was told because the auction was a fair day for the department. With the auction on June 2, 1999, it was not necessary to hurry up on 1999, because it was possible that the complainant could not collect the bid amount in such a short period of time due to his waiver and commission. Fully formed under the circumstances us immigration advocates from Nawab Shah lawyer