Find a Lawyer

RAIS KHAN, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, CENTRAL CIVIL CIRCLE, PAKISTAN PWD, LAHORE versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 9 Income Tax Ordinance (1979) Section 50 and 56 Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963), Section 17 Income tax department officers perform some illegal acts by the complainant for misuse of public office. To give. Nine other PWD officials issued notices under section 59 of the Income Tax Ordinance and Section 17 of the Wealth Tax Act 1963, the complainant alleged that such notices were declared as selective, targeted and malafide authority. Has been filed while the complainant has failed to file his return while in his jurisdiction. Revenue and wealth, as such, were legal for issuance of notices, and Pak PWI had a duty to: look after the income tax department like other government buildings and, where necessary, in connection with the new elevator installed in the building. No objection certificate illegally. Complainant cannot be sued by a private company. No documentary evidence was presented by the complainant in support of the allegation that a civil work was also demanded at the government residence Ten officials of a department were targeted to issue a notice that the income tax Use them as a tool to pressure them to meet the demands of the Department of Justice. All four had already submitted the income statement and since then there has been an existing ACCC which has been transferred. And the three were on the move and their posting was regularly checked in their first place. An officer was not yet issued notice. The targeted officers of Pak PWD were you. online advocate from Sehar Baqlas lawyer