Find a Lawyer

LT.-COL. (R) NAJAM HAMEED, FAISALABAD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 Section 9 Income Tax Ordinance (1979) Section 66A and 143B Special Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance (XVII of 2000), Corruption Complaint under Section 143B of section 5 and 6 After setting up and issuing the office, the notice under section 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 found that without his notice and information, fake assessments had been made, manipulation and fraud had been committed. A large amount of money can be refunded through a fake bank account and the checks were surrounded. And that its status was changed from person to person. ?? In response to its notice, the complainant denied all such allegations, which the department investigated and investigated as fraud. , The fraud and refund were confirmed, thus canceling the assessment and dismissing the employment inspector, who surrounded the fraudulent refund and the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000 from the Department of Complaints. In other cases, he initiated disciplinary proceedings against another officer accused of suspicion of immoral sports. This case has been investigated. Its employees and bank validity fraud and embezzlement were committed, in which the named officers were found to have been involved in deliberate or negligence, notices were issued in respect of only one officer, while the complainant department Employees and bank were found to be involved in validity fraud and embezzlement. The report did not provide any information about the four other officers identified in the report. An officer revealed the dismissal of the Central Board of Revenue. immigration advocates contact from Ubaro lawyer