Find a Lawyer

M.A. RAZA versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Establishment of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 RR2 and the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000 of the XXV), the staff honoring the taxpayer disclosing Section 9, did not disclose the informant. Notify him and also fail to disclose whether this collector was sent to the customs office and received or otherwise there was no sufficient evidence on record to prove that the case was. Initially based on the information of the complainant, and the complainant had a significant role in detecting the theft of the tax request associated with the complainant, it showed that the complainant retired from employment on 16 199 1994. While the Demand Less Show Notice was issued on 22, after his retirement in 1994, the complainant's role in the tax filing investigation and disclosure proved to be hardly a ninety-one demonstration. , Because he could not claim a reward because the Federal Tax Ombudsman's complaint would be rejected Was tax advocates from Hattian lawyer