MESSRS GULISTAN TEXTILE MILLS LTD., KARACHI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Office of the Customs Act 1969 Section 18B and 195 Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman (XXXV of 2000V), Section 2 (3) (v) and 9% of the pre-shipment inspection charges. Claims to be refunded under section. 18B of the Customs Act, 1969, by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, was termed as ultra-virus of the Federal Legislature's authority and no refund was approved nor indicated that for four years. Why didn't claims get approved despite the break? Although no refund requests have been processed for four years, no action has been taken even after receiving the directives of the Law and Justice Division and CBR, who have been in the customs department. Served a serious error and supported the public image of the custom authorities' willingness to respond to letters, requests, reminders and personal requests. To address the various problems and difficulties of the importers and exporters, a permanent system and a high level of oversight should be presented in all parts of the department. Refund claims were already dealt with and checks were also issued to applicants The Federal Tax Ombudsman, in the circumstances, recommended that the Central Board of Revenue collect the Office of the Collector to review the veracity of the decision under section 195. Directs Customs. The Customs Act provides the complainant an opportunity to hold a hearing to represent his case, and decide on the case within four weeks.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Harnai lawyer