Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 4040 Off (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance of Xenia (of 1979 of VII), Section 10 (3) Application for retraction of evidence for cross-examination in the Chief of the affected girl The witness was listed, but she could not cross-examine the date due to the absence of a lawyer for the accused under Section 404040, CRPC, to call a witness for cross-examination. Ga, who was ordered to be set for a hearing, but the trial court examined five more witnesses despite the plea hearing. And on one side of the litigation, the lawsuit was filed for the defendant's statement and the section filed under section 4040, CRPC, dismissed that the request was not pressed at the appropriate stage when the defendant's history The absence of a lawyer when the exam was filed with the victim's chief. It was not intentional, but because of the occupation before the other court, and for that reason, they could not go to trial for trial of the cases related to the courts. Examine any person whose evidence was found to be important only to the decision of the case since the victim / witness was the key witness and gave contradictory statements, so his examination and confrontation with his previous statements Reasonable and necessary to reach the fair. The equitable decision of the trial did not examine the petition filed under CRPC under Section 4040 in a legal and judicial manner, nor did it realize its legal status nor was it prosecuted. The CRPC was not enforceable under section 404040. If the accused was advocate from Nowshero Feroz lawyer