Find a Lawyer

AKHTAR ZAMIN versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Sections 33/8 evidence8 / evidence 34 Evidence was appreciated The main accused accused stated that a robbery attempt was made on the identification of the pistol which was unsuccessful and the accused was on the spot along with the investigating officer. Controversial version was available, there was nothing on record against the accused in support of the charge to show that there was any enmity between the witnesses and the accused or that it was somehow alleged that the accused was involved in a lie. He was arrested on the spot and credible evidence came into the record by eyewitnesses and The hearing was in court. The same firearm, the TT pistol, was justified in justifying the crime, which also confirmed the witnesses. The defense's request was properly deemed inappropriate and unreliable, detecting the defendant's conviction, in these circumstances cannot be interfered with. The appeal filed by the accused against his conviction was time bound and the explanation, given by the accused for the delay, was not understandable in filing the appeal and the appeal was otherwise punishable by time, Particularly rejected was the delay in filing of the condolences by the accused family advocate from Ghuzdar lawyer