I.T.AS. NOS. 1856/LB TO 1858/LB OF 2001, .DECIDED versus I.T.AS. NOS. 1856/LB TO 1858/LB OF 2001, .DECIDED
The Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 52 and 50 (1) are the responsibility of the person to fail to receive or pay tax if the increase is increased as a result of the Assessment to the Income Tax Ordinance, Section 52 of 1979 Under section 52 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, the default was declared as subsidiary. By default, speculation and speculation that rent-free housing can earn more rent in the open market and may increase the income of the assessee, with no leg to stand up to Section 50 (1). Was. ) The Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was concerned that the average basis was not deducted, even if there were some small exemptions, the clause 52 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 did not appear, withholding. There was a way to collect the tax and the income tax ordinance could not be equal to the charge or tax demand after assessment after section 52 of 1979, which could have come into the picture if it was default. Under section 50 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, which was not established in the present case, the SC was not liable for any further deduction by the Tribunal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Madinah lawyer