Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS. 4204/LB OF 2000, 442/LB, 1239/LB, 1240/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 14TH NOVEMBER, 2001. versus I.T.AS. NOS. 4204/LB OF 2000, 442/LB, 1239/LB, 1240/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 14TH NOVEMBER, 2001.

Amendment to Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 24 (c) and 156 Irrevocable Deductions Salary By way of amending balance payment expenses, the licensed property company / SCCC filed a return after the settlement of their employees' account with the tax department. ? According to the tax filing returns, the rigors of Section 24 (c) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 became unacceptable, which did not negate the accrued costs, but to ensure prompt and timely payment of taxes by the recipient of salaries. ? It should not be ignored because such provisions should be invoked only when they apply the letter and spirit of the facts and circumstances of the case, the correction was a false move and its approval by the First Appellate Authority was sufficient. The justification was immigration advocates contact from Nilam lawyer