ABDULLAH versus PROVINCE OF SINDH
Delays Delay Delay Delays To the extent the Government Department is not entitled to special treatment in the matter of demarcation, the defendants' public departments which were properly served failed to stand trial but were not heard. Even after the witness was re-deposed, he was given an opportunity to investigate, the defendants did not include evidence from any of the defendants. The defendants' conduct was negligent. The request for verification of the delay in filing an appeal was a timely acquisition of the valuable right recognized on the other hand, and it was necessary to ensure that the delay of each day was satisfactorily given to the public / governmental agency in such matters. Were not deserving of special affection, where no reasonable cause or basis was recorded in support of his order of delay and condolences. The Appellate High Court set aside the decisions and represented the negligent conduct of government officials in deciding the appropriate time to contest, defend, or prosecute the interests of their department in the decisions passed by the District Judge High Court. Has been done and in many cases results in unfair conduct and lack of proper action. The High Court was directed to send a copy of the decision to the Provincial Chief Secretary so that the responsibility of carelessness and intimacy of the concerned officer (s) as well as other persons should be sent to the High Court within six months so that he could take action. Action was taken against those responsible for causing great harm to the government
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Mansehra lawyer