Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUHAMMAD SHALGIRI versus S.H.O., SHAHDADKOT

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 154 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 and 4 Constitutional Petitions The father of the applicant, who was registered by the police in a blind FIR under section 325 and 379 Was arrested in a crime under In which no culprit was named, the petitioner alleged that while his son was in police custody, the policemen beat him severely and severely damaged his head and other parts of his body. There were bruises and lime powder and vapors were injected into her ears and mouth. As a result, her condition had worsened. The petitioners had requested that after confirming the applicant's son, an FIR should be lodged against the police officers responsible for the action against his son's medical officer, who appeared during the detention. The police medical certificate said that it was proof that an incident was called, but it was difficult for the High Court to make an opinion about the commission of the act by a particular person and get it. To be held responsible for such criminal activity, such a finding has been submitted by the trial court petitioner, however, Article 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) does not have the necessary right. If the case is proved to be a cognizable offense, the High Court directed that the applicant, when he appeared at the relevant police station and gave a statement, filed the case as well. And an FIR should be filed best law firms from Mangi lawyer