Find a Lawyer

TALAT MEHMOOD versus MUHAMMAD ILYAS

Response to evidence of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 Criminal Code (V 1898), Section 342 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) proved to be a crime of sudden outrage based on the statement of the accused, p. The C prosecution failed to prove that the witnesses were allegedly present at the scene of the incident, in their statement under Section 342, the CCP admitted that the victim entered his house and arrested a woman The trial court sentenced the accused because of the murder of the accused. And sentenced him to death under section 2302, the PPC High Court upheld the conviction in the exercise of jurisdiction but the death sentence was converted to life imprisonment. The complainant sought to increase the conviction of the accused. He suddenly filed a case of aggression when the victim entered his home and his women. The present case was not an extension of the sentence. If the accused had to base his sentence, he would have to accept or reject it. Because the whole court had refused to extend the sentence passed by the High Court, refusing leave of appeal. Was done best advocate from Kurram Agency lawyer