Find a Lawyer

MEHR MUHAMMAD AMIR, CHINIOT versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

The chief executive order 12, the referendum order 2002 section 9 income tax, ordinance (XXXX of 1979), section 108, 116,139 and 156 accused / bank manager misconduct was alleged that the Assistant Commissioner Income Tax was fined under section 108. Was involved in the mill administration. Ignoring the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, that the complainant has already responded to the notice under Section 139 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, on 21 11 1998, under section 116 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979. Released, this statement has been accepted. The assertions submitted by the complainant were signed by the Inspector Income Taxes posted in the Circle at that time, but it was stated that the statement / letter was not found in the Circle's internal postal register nor the complainant on record What was once an official working in the circle acknowledged receipt of the documents. , Then the SC will be deemed to have fulfilled its obligation and cannot be bothered with it. The complainant's error regarding the accuracy of the Circle Office was fixed under section 139 Income Tax Ordinance, 1979. He did not file a statement for the year ending 30 6 1998 till 1998, but he discharged his responsibility on 21 11 1998, thus remaining a defaulter from 29 1998 to 20 11 1998. That is, the fact of inadequacy on the letters and statement records submitted in response to the notice for a period of 80 days without good reason and the Inspector Income Tax which was ignored The addiction, lack of oversight and failure to maintain administrative discipline and control, which the Federal Tax Ombudsman explicitly recommends to the Revenue, recommended that the Deputy Commissioner Income Tax us immigration advocates from Dadu lawyer