MUHAMMAD JEHANGIR versus THE STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 / 34,337 F (v) / 449/148/149, Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Reassessment of Evidence Supported by Medical Evidence, Your Statements I am a witness to this phenomenon. Before the trial court overruled any suspicion of litigation against the accused, the doctors appearing as prosecution witnesses also dealt with the injured person's injuries and eyewitnesses to the victim. Of the seven accused, the trial court sentenced the two accused to death and two were sentenced to life imprisonment while three persons were acquitted in the jurisdiction of the appeal, while all the accused's death sentence remains intact but the conviction of one accused. The death has been converted to life imprisonment, the accused's sentence remains intact. The High Court affirmed the conviction that his case was similar to the case of the accused who faced life imprisonment against the accused, the record's evidence proved that the High Court verdict was somehow There was no legal or factual inconvenience and the conviction of the accused was proved on record. Case Supreme Court refuses to interfere in High Court's decision as no interference request was made
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Shadiwal lawyer