FAYYAZ HUSSAIN SHAH versus THE STATE
Section 302/324/148/149 Counter-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Recovery of Kalashnikov rifle at the scene of naturalistic evidence 5/6 hours after the incident was charged An inside statement of the injured prosecution's witness was recorded. The trial court sentenced the accused to life imprisonment and sentenced him, who was retained by the High Court, to provide evidence of any unlawful will, malice or misconduct with the prosecution witness, evidence of the prosecution's testimony was natural, credible And was unrecognizable, the same thing was rightly convinced that the High Court did not find any legal error in the judgment which was based on proper scrutiny of the evidence and the Supreme Court dismissed the principles of safe management of criminal justice. Had done.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Ranipur lawyer
