Find a Lawyer

NASIR PERVAIZ versus SHAZIA QAYYUM

The suit was dismissed by the Family Court in order to dissolve the marriage of Khulla due to the compromise between the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Family Courts Act 1993 Section 5, Schedule, Section 10 and 12 parties. It has become impossible for a wife to live together. Allaah challenged the appeal within the limits set by the Family Court, on the basis that it failed to comply with the provisions of sections 10 and 12 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Family Courts Act, 1993, and tried to influence the settlement. After trying The parties had failed the trial. Evidence shows that after filing a written statement by the defendant, a date for settlement was reached, but on the relevant date the trial court concluded that reconciliation between the parties was not possible, evidence from both parties was closed. After the Family Court made another attempt to reach a compromise between the spouses, but again concluded, they concluded that the plaintiff had incurred hatred against the defendant and that the plaintiff at any cost. The defendant did not want to be with. The provision of validity, in the circumstances, was fully complied with, under the circumstances, sections 10 and 12 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Family Courts Act, 1993. Failure to comply with sections 10 and 12 of the Family Court of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Family Courts Act 1993, will not justify rejecting any decree to dissolve a marriage passed by the Family Court because it was merely irregular. When the claimant had already tried to obtain a decree. Courts abroad for dissolution of marriage and even in favor of the defendant famous lower court advocate from Jhang lawyer