Find a Lawyer

CH. ABID SAEED versus THE STATE

Sections 161, 162, 163, 185 A & 185 C Criminal Procedure (V 1898), SA (1) (s), 5 (2), 54, 59, 60, 61, 167, 160, 161, 169, 154 , 172, 173, 164, 103, 190 and 497 bail, for non-issuance of a police station notification under section 4 (1) (s) for the smuggling charges, CCPC for Customer Effect Provisions of Customer Act 19369 And the Criminal Code of Conduct, 1898, shows that arrests, searches, reports, remands, inquiries, charge sheets, as well as the seriousness of the seriousness of the charge sheet, in sections 161, 162, 163 and 185A of the Customs Act 1969 There are similar provisions. In respect of offenses under the Customs Act, the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, section 1898, under section 5 (2), shall not be applicable when there is a provision of the regulation in relation to such matters. The provisions of the Procedure for this purpose or the Customs Act, 1969, are filed under section 4 (1) (s) of the police station, instead of inquiring into or investigating such crimes, the customs customer The Act shall not report or investigate to the CRPC, with no jurisdiction in relation to the offenses found in 1969. Therefore, it cannot be disclosed that their case requires inquiry. In the absence of a report to the police station, the customs officer cannot investigate the case, where there is no reasonable basis for a bail application to believe that the suspect did not commit the crime. The case of an accused was dismissed as the driver of a car that was carrying the cargo and lacked evidence in connection with his involvement with the other accomplices, a further investigation was needed. advocates from Sibi lawyer