Find a Lawyer

STATE OF PAKISTAN versus HUSSAIN ABDULLAH SALUM

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 403 of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 6 and 7 of the Customs Act (IV of 1969), Section 156 (1) (8) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 13 (a) and ? (185) Appeal for leave on appeal The question of the importance of the common man banned from delaying the time restriction, he was sentenced to two years imprisonment on the basis of the conviction of the accused, 1969, and the accused. While the accused was undergoing punishment, while another case was under section 6 and 7 of the Drug Substances Act 1997. And on the basis of the accused's confession, he was again convicted and sentenced to four years imprisonment. The High Court declared That the trial was proved before the customs court and the appeal for leave to appeal if found guilty, was proved guilty. B Compensation was taken by 273 days and no notice was issued to the Attorney General or the Deputy Attorney General. While interpreting the provisions of the Special Law contained in the Control of the Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, the state held that it was a Supreme Court action, working smoothly to deal with delays, in matters relating to the criminal justice system. , Where important questions of the importance of the common people were filed, the appeal was filed. The court had considered. Did the High Court adopt the doctrine that it was in accordance with the law and could hold a consistent view of the decision as Sabir Shah bin Shad Muhammad Khan PLD 1995 SC 66? list of advocates from Tando Jam lawyer