Find a Lawyer

AIR MARSHAL (RETD.) WAQAR AZIM versus THE STATE

Section 9 (a) (viii) / 10 accused of praising the evidence was involved only in taking action on the matter and sanctioning financial assistance under the Export Refinance Scheme and they did not have any financial assistance in connection with the financial assistance. Didn't act. Company directors took advantage, so the bar in section 31C of the NAB Ordinance was not attracted to the bank's manager and the bank's zonal head was primarily responsible for initiating and advancing the case with certain conditions. Had performed the ceremony. To some extent were beneficial to the bank if the aforementioned defendants acted under the influence of the bank's advanced publications or under the influence of the co-accused, they would have had the terms contained in these terms from the beginning. Introduced by provincial credit. The committee said that the two accused could be liable for administrative proceedings under the relevant bank rules, but were not fined. Otherwise, the offense under section 9 (a) (vi) of the NAB Ordinance 1999 was not raised, otherwise, the accused was not questioned while inadvertently benefitting from exercising his authority under Section 342 CCPC. Investigations into his alleged failure were made to prevent the confession of. Or benefit of the company and the termination of their sentence by non-fulfillment of such legal requirements, the accused was acquitted best advocate from Talhur lawyer