Find a Lawyer

MALIK MUHAMMAD SHANNAF, OFFICER OFMUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD., SIALKOT versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Complainant / Bank Employee Complaint against Chief Executive Order 12, Referendum Order 2002 S9 Income Tax Ordinance (1979), Section 50 (1); Income Tax Inspector, Diagnostic Officer and Recovery Officer, 54, & 85 and Government There was a demand for illegal refusal to finalize the assessment in corruption-related matters of the Servants (Performance and Discipline) Regulations, 1973, Rr 3 and 4. The complainant did not pay any bribe, which was deducted from the original tax deduction, on which recovery proceedings were initiated against him and other employees of the bank, and he was arrested, against the defendants' behavior. Protests were made, but untrustworthy respondents could attach salary. And if the complainant's bank account is any, and above all, recovery can be made from the bank, which had deducted the tax, the complainant's arrest and detention proceedings are similar to the other bank's 44 statement. An affidavit was not filed to support his allegations. Employees, but the defendants could not deny or deny their testimony despite the cross-examination Income Tax Insp. The charge sought to provide a chance for bribe and harassment against the Income Tax Inspector and to present similar allegations. Did not present any witnesses and repeatedly sought bankruptcy by other tax employees who demanded money for finalization and completion. An examination of the evidence on record was clearly established that it appears that the entire action taken against the complainant retaliated against it by the respondents. Although similar to the one listed by an employee of the company pakistani advocates Khanqah Sharif lawyer